|
Frequently Asked Questions - Data
General, Block, Load Following Full Requirements, AEC
Return to Main FAQ Page
| General |
| 1. |
Q. |
In the Rate Category & Load data file on the RFP Web site, does the data for Rate Schedule GS-3 in the SCI and SCI 2008+ tabs comprise data for the entire rate class or only those customers with less than 500 kW peak demand? Will data for Rate Schedule LP-4 customers with less than 500 kW peak demand be provided? |
| |
A. |
Thank you for bringing this to PPL Electric’s attention. Updated data have been posted to the RFP Web site, and an announcement was sent to all Web site registrants on July 15, 2009 regarding this posting.
Under PPL Electric's Default Service Procurement Plan (“DSPP”), Rate Schedule LP-4 customers with less than 500 kW peak demand will be included in the Small Commercial and Industrial (“Small C&I”) Customer Group and Rate Schedule GS-3 customers with 500 kW or greater peak demand will be included in the Large Commercial and Industrial (“Large C&I”) Customer Group. The determination of peak demand will be based on the customer's peak load contribution to PJM peak load in the PJM 2008-2009 Planning Year. This initial determination of peak demand and classification of customers will remain effective for the entire term of PPL Electric’s DSPP.
Historical hourly load data provided for Rate Schedule GS-3 customers and Rate Schedule LP-4 customers do not include the breakdowns based on the initial determination of peak demand. However, customer counts and load percentages based on the initial determination of peak demand and classification of customers are provided in the “main” tab of the updated load data spreadsheet. Monthly sales and customer count information have been updated to provide additional data for Rate Schedule GS-3 and LP-4 customers between the Small C&I Group and the Large C&I Group based on the initial determination of peak demand and classification of customers. |
|
|
|
| 2. |
Q. |
Why are there gaps of data missing in the Residential and SC&I historical hourly data files? |
|
A. |
Historical load data is not available the period 12/23/2007-1/02/2008 and 2/21/2008. PPL Electric has been deploying an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) over the past few years, which has resulted in the replacement of all 1.4 million meters. As with any new system, there have been some problems during the transition, which have resulted in the loss of hourly load data. PPL Electric has been working with their vendors in an effort to eliminate issues such as this. PPL electric is also installing a Meter Data Management System, which will be functional later in 2009, that will ensure that hourly data are available for all hours. |
|
|
|
| 3. |
Q. |
Please provide historical hourly data broken out by all eligible customers, default service customers, and shopping customers. |
|
A. |
As stated on the tab of the data spreadsheet labeled "Main," all load values are total retail (including shopping). PPL Electric only has aggregate load data for shopping customers. Currently, most of the shopping customers are in the Large Commercial and Industrial ("C&I") Group and supply for the Large C&I customers is not part of the August 2009 solicitation. PPL Electric does not have historical hourly load data for shopping customers broken out for the rate schedules in the Residential Group or the Small C&I Group. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Q. |
How are the PLCs provided in the RFP Rules calculated, and what is the underlying reason for the jump in the Residential PLC and Small C&I PLC values compared to the March 2009 solicitation under PPL Electric’s Competitive Bridge Plan? |
|
A. |
PJM Forecasted PLCs are referenced in DSPP RFP Documents and are used to delineate the number of tranches and tranche size (MW) which are then used in the RFP auction. They represent expected PLC based upon the PPL Zone according to PJM – taking into consideration a number of factors including, but not limited to customer and consumption growth, weather variations, and economic trending.
There are a number of reasons why 2010 forecast PLCs differ from 2011 & 2012 PLCs – the first of which is that the 2010 PLCs referenced in the CBP are the result of a forecast based upon 2005 peak load, whereas the 2011 and 2012 PLCs referenced in the DSPP are the result of a forecast based upon 2008 peak load. The more recent PLCs incorporates updated assumptions not previously available in 2005 – the greatest of which are changes in weather and economic trending.
Please reference the 2009 PJM Load Forecast Report (found here) which dictates differences from the 2008 Forecast PLC and includes projected PLCs per zone. Important take-away points from this report include a 4.2% decrease in forecast 2008 PLC to forecast 2009 PLC. Furthermore, page 13 of the report shows two graphs (summer and winter peak demand) that include actual historic demand and forecast demand; both of which show significant changes from season to season and year to year. Finally, the report also shows that PPL’s forecast 2011 and 2012 values are nearly exactly the same as PJM forecast values.
We would like to emphasize that all of these PLCs are “forecast” values, based upon a litany of assumptions, and therefore will change to match actual peak load once supply begins. Also available are historic PLC values found in the “Rate Category and Load Data” workbook on PPL’s DSPP Site (found here), which show changes and variations in PPL Zone PLC from year to year, from 2004 to 2008. |
|
|
|
| 5. |
Q. |
Please provide the latest PLC values from June 2009 through May 2010 for both Residential and Small C&I Customer Groups. |
|
A. |
Please see the file titled “PPL_ICAP_PLC_Values_072209.xls”, available here. |
|
|
|
| 6. |
Q. |
Please provide the hourly aggregate historical load for the adjusted GS-3 (without 500 kW and above) and adjusted LP-4 (without 500 kW and below) categories. |
|
A. |
PPL Electric is unable to provide hourly aggregate historical load due to the way PPL Electric’s system gathers and breaks-down the data according to profile type. PPL Electric’s load data is an aggregate load value across all rate classes – each rate class has an applicable load profile associated with it, which is then applied to the aggregate load number to break-down this number into specific rate classes. Because those customers within the rates classes GS-3 and LP-4 above and below 500 kW are imbedded in the rate profile for GS-3 and LP-4 as a whole, not based upon kW usage, they are unable to be specifically broken out. This is unlike energy usage data which is aggregated on a bottom-up approach, aggregating usage data on a meter by meter basis. For this reason, monthly break-downs of GS-3 and LP-4 customers (according to the 500 kW split) is the only data available within the “Rate Category & Load Data” spreadsheet. |
|
|
|
| 7. |
Q. |
What process is PPL Electric required to follow to change the classification of customers, rate classes or strata among Customer Supply Groups? Will PPL Electric publicly file with the PUC if the Company were to propose making such a change? What notification and revised load data will PPL Electric provide to Sellers and RFP Bidders? |
|
A. |
The Customer Supply Groups are defined in the Default Service Procurement Plan reviewed and approved by the Commission. Those Customer Supply Groups are:
The Residential Customer Group, which includes rate schedules RS, RTS and RTD.
The Small Commercial Customer Group, which includes small commercial and industrial customers served under rate schedules GS-1, GH-1, GH-2, IS-1, BL, SA, SM, SHS, SE, TS, SI-1, Standby and the customers from the following rate schedules whose peak demand is less than 500 kW: GS-3, LP-4.
The Large Commercial and Industrial Customer Group includes customers on rate schedules ISP, LP-5, LP-6, LPEP, IST, ISM and the customers from the following rate schedules whose peak demand is equal to or greater than 500 kW: GS-3, LP-4.
PPL Electric does not expect to change the rate schedules that are part of each Customer Supply Group for the duration of the PUC-approved Default Service Procurement Plan, other than as required to comply with applicable regulation and/or legislation. If any change to the rate schedules that are part of each Customer Supply Group occur, notification will be issued.
The PPL Electric EGS Coordination tariff explains the process of developing the load profile for each rate class and can be found at: click here. Any changes to the EGS Coordination tariff must be submitted to the PUC for review. |
|
|
|
| 8. |
Q. |
When does the reclassification of GS-3 customers with peak demand equal or greater than 500 kW and LP-4 customers with peak demand less than 500 kW take effect? |
|
A. |
This reclassification of GS-3 customers with peak demand equal or greater than 500 kW and LP-4 customers with peak demand less than 500 kW takes effect on January 1, 2011. Under PPL Electric's Default Service Procurement Plan (“DSPP”), Rate Schedule LP-4 customers with less than 500 kW peak demand will be included in the Small Commercial and Industrial (“Small C&I”) Customer Group and Rate Schedule GS-3 customers with 500 kW or greater peak demand will be included in the Large Commercial and Industrial (“Large C&I”) Customer Group. The determination of peak demand will be based on the customer's peak load contribution to PJM peak load in the PJM 2008-2009 Planning Year. This initial determination of peak demand and classification of customers will remain effective for the entire term of PPL Electric’s DSPP. |
|
|
|
| 9. |
Q. |
What is the current PLC and NSPL per tranche for Residential and Small Commercial & Industrial customers? |
|
A. |
The capacity Peak Load Contribution values for the PJM planning year from June 1, 2009 through May 31, 2010 are:
Residential: 2876 MW Small Commercial & Industrial: 1976 MW Large Commercial & Industrial: 1885 MW
The NSPL or Network Service Peak Load value applies only to transmission costs for which PPL Electric is responsible and is not a component of the supplier’s costs; therefore is not provided. As stated in section 2.3 of the Full Requirements SMA, “Buyer shall be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for the provision of Network Integration Transmission Service for PPL Electric customers and distribution service necessary to serve the Specified Percentage.” |
|
|
|
| 10. |
Q. |
Please confirm that the PLC provided for the Small Commercial and Industrial Group excludes all customers in the LP-4 rate schedule. If that is so, please provide the PLCs of GS-3 customers that would be removed since their peak demand is >500 kW and the PLCs of the LP-4 customers who will be added since their peak demand is <500 kW. |
|
A. |
This is correct, the PLC provided for the Small Commercial and Industrial Group excludes all customers in the LP-4 rate schedule. We are unable to provide the requested information at this time. As described in question Data/General FAQ-4, the PLCs for Residential Customers, Small C&I and Large C&I are all forecast PLCs, calculated by PPL Electric for the rate classes and their customers within those classes. The gross PLC value is based on the prior years peak, which is weather normalized, and then this value is broken down by rate class according to the rate class profile. The current profile does not include this distinction (the GS-3 and LP-4 customers > and < 500 kW) and attempting to remove specific customers from the profile could disrupt the integrity of the profile. Also, please note that these PLCs are forecasts and will change once actual supply begins. |
|
|
|
| 11. |
Q. |
With reference to the information regarding GS-3 and LP-4 customer breakdowns provided on the main tab of the “Rate Category & Load Data” workbook, it appears that you used some sort of PLC data to supply estimates of the energy and customer count breakouts. Why can't the PLCs be summed to provide PLC Data for the Small C&I customer group? |
|
A. |
The data regarding GS-3 and LP-4 customers supplied in the on the main tab of the “Rate Category & Load Data” workbook, breaking out customer counts and estimated kWh usage was derived looking at actual historical usage data by customer (as provided in the Rate Category & Load Data workbook on the DSPP website), not vetting out these numbers based upon capacity values. As described in Data/General FAQ-10, rate class profiles do not currently exists for 2011 and beyond, therefore PLCs for GS-3 and LP-4 cannot be individually tabulated. For this reason, PLCs cannot be summed, as you have requested.
Please see also Data/General FAQ-12 for more information. |
|
|
|
| 12. |
Q. |
With reference to Data/General FAQ-10 and Data/General FAQ-11, please provide a breakout of the 2009-10 PLCs, which are in existence today, for Small C&I (with GS-3 and LP-4 Customers below 500 kW) and Large C&I customers (with GS-3 and LP-4 Customers at or above 500 kW). |
|
A. |
The data system is not currently set up to retrieve and delineate the requested capacity data according to the 500 kW break-out for GS-3 and LP-4 customers. While the raw information exists, the classes are currently delineated according to a predescribed profile, not aggregated as usage data is from individual customer meters. The historical capacity PLC data posted on the RFP Web site was not developed by summing individual customer PLCs, but by using profiles. Hence, it is not an easy exercise to change customer group definition. PPL Electric is attempting to pull the requested data, but will not be able to provide this information before the Bid Proposal Due Date of August 11, 2009, for this first solicitation. This information will be posted to the RFP Web site when it becomes available and an announcement will be sent to all web site registrants. PPL Electric expects to have this information available in time for the second solicitation Bid Proposal Due Date of October 20, 2009.
Please note that data has been posted, which shows GS-3 loads relative to total SC&I loads and LP-4 loads relative to LC&I loads. Data has also been provided, which shows the percent of GS-3 sales above 500 kW and the percent of LP-4 sales under 500 kW. Hence using energy based ratios you can estimate PLC values.
Please also see Data/General FAQ-5 for the file titled “PPL_ICAP_PLC_Values_072209.xls” regarding the latest PLC values for all Customer Groups. |
|
|
|
| 13. |
Q. |
Please provide PLCs by rate class for all eligible customers, default service customers, and shopping customers. |
|
A. |
Please refer to the Rate Category and Load Data found (here) for PLC data broken out by month and for all customer classes. We are unable to provide any greater granularity on this data at this time. Please refer to Data/General FAQ-4 for more information. |
|
|
|
| 14. |
Q. |
The highest historical PLC for the Residential Group in the last three years has been 2,975, however, forecast PLCs are in the 3,500 to 3,700 range. Please explain the over 20% growth expected in this class by 2011. |
|
A. |
There are a number of reasons why 2010 forecast PLCs differ from 2011 & 2012 PLCs, and concurrently, why they do not seemingly match provided historical values. Historical values are actuals, whereas forecast values are based on a number of assumptions and trending, derived through PJM modeling assumptions. Please reference question 4 above which describes how forecast PLCs are derived by PJM. Also, please take into consideration that the forecast values are just that, forecasts, and therefore will change when actual peak load contributions become available once supply starts. |
|
|
|
| 15. |
Q. |
How is the tranche size calculated? |
|
A. |
The tranche size is calculated by dividing 100% by the total number of tranches for a Customer Group. The total number of tranches for a Customer Group is determined on the basis of the Peak Load Contribution (not on the basis of historical hourly load data) determined so that each tranche is approximately 50 MW of PLC for that Customer Group. Please note that the PLC for a Customer Group includes customers on Default Service as well as customers that take service from an EGS. Please see Data/General FAQ-4 for information about how the PLCs provided in the RFP Rules are calculated. As stated in section 1.1.16 of the RFP Rules, “…A Default Service Supplier serving one tranche in a particular product for a Customer Group is responsible for serving a fixed percentage of that Customer Group’s Default Service Load represented by one tranche…” |
|
|
|
| 16. |
Q. |
The sum of the 2008 MWh for the GL rate class in the “Rate Categories and Load Data” file equals 2,185,799 MWh. The sum of the 2008 MWh for the GL rate class in the “Size Distributions” file equals 1,982,234 MWh. Which one of these data sets is correct? |
| |
A. |
First, there is no GL rate class – there is a BL rate class and a series of GS rate classes. We believe the 2,185,799 MWh value you supplied comes from adding the 2008 Small C&I data for GS-1 and BL (under Rate Category & Load Data); we also believe the 1,982,234 MWh value is derived by adding the GS-1 data for 2008 (under Size Distributions). Based upon this assumption, the reason there is a difference between these values is that the MWh value in the Rate Category & Load Data includes BL, or Borderline, customers which is an estimate value – BL is not included as a component of the GS-1 MWh within the Size Distribution file. Both are correct values and can be used, but simply contain different classes as defined in the heading. |
| |
|
|
| 17. |
Q. |
In the main tab of the rate categories and load data file, customer counts are provided for the GS3 (20,642) and LP4 (1,016) rate classes. What date are these customer counts as of? Why don't these customer counts correspond to the counts in the MonthlyBillCounts tab of the same spreadsheet for either class? |
|
A. |
The customer count break-outs for GS-3 and LP-4 customers on the “Main” tab of the Rate Category and Load Data workbook were tabulated as of June 10, 2009. The summed values you’ve provided in your question differ from the Monthly Billed Counts because many small and large commercial and industrial customers receive multiple bills, but are listed as a single customer. Thus, there will be a difference between the customer count numbers and monthly billed counts. |
|
|
|
| 18. |
Q. |
What was the PLC on 5/31/09, 6/1/09 and 9/30/09 for all three customer classes? |
|
A. |
PPL Electric does not currently have this information readily available. |
|
|
|
| 19. |
Q. |
What was the NSPL on 12/31/07, 1/1/08, 12/31/08, 1/1/09, 9/30/09? |
|
A. |
PPL Electric does not currently have this information readily available. |
|
|
|
| 21. |
Q. |
Can you provide the daily zonal scaling factors for PPL zone from June 2007 through January 2010? |
|
A. |
Zonal Scaling Factors for the 2009/2010 delivery year is available on the PJM website, here. Additional scaling factors are not readily available and will not be able to be provided at this time. |
|
|
|
| 22. |
Q. |
There has been an extreme amount of press related to Residential shopping statistics within the PPL service territory. It seems that there should be available Residential customer counts / percentages of customers that have signed up or are currently being served by EGS suppliers. Can you please provide a migration report or the current PLC for each tranche adjusted for migration? |
|
A. |
As of the week of January 11th, 2010, approximately 225,000 customers (across all classes) have switched energy suppliers. Of the approximately 225,000 customers that have switched, approximately 190,000 are Residential customers. Depending on when each customer’s meter read date is, they may have already begun receiving supply from their new supplier or will in the coming weeks.
For additional information on PLC’s per customer class, please refer to the Aggregate PLC Summary Data file for additional information that PPL Electric is providing to all bidders at this time. |
|
|
|
| 23. |
Q. |
The data file updated on January 12, 2010 includes hourly data through December 31, 2009. What period of data includes the 60-day adjustment? Please confirm that PPL has used profiles to estimate the data for the period that does not include the 60-day adjustment. |
|
A. |
The data through October 31, 2009 includes the 60-day adjustments, and the data posted for November 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 use profiles to estimate that data. |
|
|
|
| 24. |
Q. |
With the rate caps having rolled off in PPL and customers starting to switch to retail competition, can you provide bidders with a 7-day forecast of PLCs by customer type for both shopping and non-shopping customers? |
|
A. |
For current energy suppliers under the Competitive Bridge Plan, in accordance with the CBP SMA, 7-day forecast data is available through PJM’s eRPM Web site. Both historical and forecast data is available according to each supplier’s short name. Additional break-outs are not available through PJM’s eSuite System.
PPL Electric has also recently released some Aggregate PLC Summary Data information per class available on the PPL POLR Web site. |
| 25. |
Q. |
There are significant differences between your monthly billed sales data and the historical hourly load values for any given month. I have seen CBP-DATA/FAQ-11, which explains the differences due to “billing timing”. Can you confirm that the correct data to use for historical energy use is the hourly energy (as opposed to the billed sales energy)? |
|
A. |
For actual usage during a given month, please use the hourly load data provided in the Rate Category and Load Data file. Please note that for the historical load data, all load values are for total retail customers (including shopping) at the generation level and include all losses. |
|
|
|
| 26. |
Q. |
Can you provide the annual historical PLCs for the Large C&I customer group in addition to what is provided for the Residential and Small C&I customer groups. I understand that the PLCs provided for the Small C&I and Large C&I will be based on existing rate schedules used under PPL Electric’s competitive bridge plan. Providing the PLCs for the Large C&I customer group will enable a recalculation of the Small C&I class history associated with the GS-3 and LP-4 class shifts? |
|
A. |
As requested, historical annual PLC data for the Large C&I customer group have been provided in the capacity tab of the Rate Categories and Load Data file. Information provided for the Small C&I and Large C&I customer groups are based on existing rate schedules used under PPL Electric’s competitive bridge plan. Please refer to DSPP Data/General FAQ-1 as well as the “Main” tab of the Rate Categories and Load Data file for additional monthly sales and customer count information related to the GS-3 and LP-4 rate classes. |
|
|
|
| 27. |
Q. |
Please also provide NSPL values for 2010 as well as PLC values for planning year 10/11 with a breakdown between shopping and non-shopping customers. |
|
A. |
Updated annual PLC and NSPL data by Customer Group have been provided in the “Capacity” tab and “NSPL-NITS” tab, respectively, of the Rate Categories and Load Data file. The annual PLC data is only for eligible load. In addition, PPL Electric has provided, in the Aggregate PLC Summary Data file, aggregate PLC values per customer group for POLR customers to help facilitate analysis of migration levels. This data is an estimate of PLC by customer group and is only a snapshot in time. |
|
|
|
| 28. |
Q. |
Please provide an updated data file which contains hourly data by rate class for both shopping and non-shopping customers. |
|
A. |
Updated historical hourly load data for eligible load through February 2010, and monthly billed sales and counts for eligible and shopping customers through April 2010 are also provided in the Rate Categories and Load Data file. For additional information regarding the hourly load data and monthly billed sales data, please also refer to DSPP Data/General FAQ-25.
PPL Electric does not expect to post additional data prior to the Bid Proposal Due Date of April 20, 2010 for this solicitation. |
|
|
|
| 29. |
Q. |
Please provide PLC values for Residential load and Small Commercial & Industrial load for 12/1/2009. |
|
A. |
PPL Electric does not currently have this information readily available. |
|
|
|
| 30. |
Q. |
Please provide PLC data for 1/1/2010 - 1/6/2010 in the Aggregate PLC Summary Data file. |
|
A. |
PPL Electric does not currently have this information readily available. |
|
|
|
| 31. |
Q. |
With reference to the historical load data posted on April 8, 2010, the hourly load data for November and December 2009 appears to be identical to the data posted in January 2010 and does not appear to be updated to include the 60-day adjustment. Can you confirm this fact? |
|
A. |
PPL Electric uses the 60-day adjustment primarily to shift load from one supplier to another. As in the historical load data provided is on an aggregate basis by rate class, and there was primarily only one supplier, PPL Electric did not perform a 60-day reconciliation. The rate class load data on the RFP Web site is the only rate class load data that is available. Also, please note that PPL Electric transitioned to a new Meter Data Management System (MDMS) in 2009, which became fully functional in January 2010. The MDMS provides PPL Electric with hourly data available for all hours, and will use profiles only when the hourly metered data are unavailable.
The data provided for November and December 2009 are provided using the MDMS. Suppliers are to note that this is a change in the methodology of gathering the historical load data. On a go-forward basis, PPL Electric will be relying on the new MDMS system to generate historical load data. |
|
|
|
| 32. |
Q. |
With reference to the Rate Category and Load Data file that was updated on April 16, 2010, please explain what was updated. |
|
A. |
The Rate Category and Load Data file that was updated on April 16, 2010, corrected for four (4) numbers; namely, the February and March 2010 data reported in the tab “ShoppingBilledSales” for the rate classes “LP4 < 500 kW” and “LP4 >= 500 kW”. These four data points were previously reported in error.
PPL Electric has since provided updated historical hourly load data for eligible load through February 2010, and monthly billed sales and counts for eligible and shopping customers through April 2010 in the latest file dated May 21, 2010. |
|
|
|
| 33. |
Q. |
Do the Monthly Bill Counts and the Monthly Billed Sales reflect only customers on default service or customers that are shopping as well as taking default service? |
|
A. |
With reference to the Rate Category and Load Data, the Monthly Billed Counts and Monthly Billed Sales data includes all customers (shopping and default service customers).
Please note that the Rate Category and Load Data file was updated on April 16, 2010. The updated file dated April 16, 2010, corrected for four (4) numbers; namely, the February and March 2010 data reported in the tab “ShoppingBilledSales” for the rate classes “LP4 < 500 kW” and “LP4 >= 500 kW”, which were previously reported in error.
PPL Electric has since provided updated historical hourly load data for eligible load through February 2010, and monthly billed sales and counts for eligible and shopping customers through April 2010 in the latest file dated May 21, 2010. |
|
|
|
| 34. |
Q. |
Can you provide Monthly Sales without adjustments from prior months in Rate Categories Load Data file? |
|
A. |
PPL Electric does not have this information readily available. |
|
|
|
| 35. |
Q. |
Please provide RPM historical daily zonal scaling factors as this data is not available on the PJM RPM Web site. If available, please also provide projected PY 10/11 daily scaling factors. |
|
A. |
This information is available in eRPM through eSuites from PJM. |
| |
|
|
| 36. |
Q. |
Do the PLC numbers on slide 21 of the bidder information webcast presentation and section 1.1.16 the Full Requirements RFP Rules reflect migration levels? |
|
A. |
No, the PLC numbers provided on slide 21 of the bidder information webcast presentation and in section 1.1.16 of the Full Requirements RFP Rules are forecast values of total zonal load and are used for the purpose of determining the number of tranches needed for the RFP. Please refer to Data/General FAQ-4 for more information regarding the forecast values.
For historical PLC values, please refer to the “Rate Category and Load Data” as well as the “Aggregate PLC Summary Data” on PPL Electric's RFP Web site. |
|
|
|
| 37. |
Q. |
Can you please explain the sharp drop in default service PLCs for all customer types? This drop should not be due to a change in PLC planning periods between May 31 and June 1 given the fact that the dataset only uses planning period 2010/2011 PLCs. |
|
A. |
The decline in PLCs for default service customers (Aggregate PLC Summary Data) is due to migration as well as to an update by the Company to the PLCs for the 2010/2011 planning period. Please note that the update in the PLCs is only applicable starting June 1, 2010 as the 2010/2011 planning period starts on June 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
| 38. |
Q. |
Has the 300 MW block energy and the 50 MW unit entitlement supply been removed from the Hourly Residential Load Values as posted on your Web site? |
|
A. |
The hourly load data provided in the “Rate Category and Load Data” file reflect total zonal load of all retail customers (including shopping) on a historical basis. As such, the 300 MW block energy and the 500 MW unit entitlement supply have not been removed from this data series. |
| 39. |
Q. |
Does the PLC value need to be grossed up to include losses or are losses already included in this value? |
|
A. |
The PLC values include all losses, and do not need to be grossed up for losses. To convert to capacity obligation they need only be adjusted by the appropriate scaling factors as described in Data/General FAQ-21 and Data/General FAQ-35. |
| 40. |
Q. |
Can you please provide the daily Res NSPLs since the beginning of 2010 and the Res NSPL on 12/31/07, 12/31/08 and 12/31/09? Please also provide aggregate PLC and NSPL data for Residential customers as at July 3, 2010. |
|
A. |
The NSPL values are available in the Rate Category and Load data file located here. The NSPL is calculated as an annual value associated with the PPL Zone and is scaled up or down based on customer changes to match the target NSPL value calculated on an annual basis. Additional data are not readily available and will not be provided at this time. |
| 41. |
Q. |
Would you please post the most recent 60 day reconciled hourly load data? The reconciled load for more recent months should be available. |
| |
A. |
Updated load data are now available and posted to the RFP website: click here. Please also consult Data/General FAQ-31 for information about the data that is provided. |
| 42. |
Q. |
On the PA OCA website, the Electric Shopping Statistics document indicates the residential migration by customer load as of July 3, 2010 is 35.9%. However, when I divide the Residential POLR PLC in the Aggregate PLC Summary Data as of July 3 (1902 MW) by the total residential eligible PLC in the Rate Categories and Load Data "Capacity" tab (2809.62 MW), I get 67.7% of customers served or 32.3% migration. Which data is a better reflection of migration? |
| |
A. |
PPL Electric has provided aggregate PLC values per Customer Group for default service customers in order to facilitate analysis of migration levels. This data is available in the file titled Aggregate PLC Summary Data located here. PPL Electric has not reviewed the document provided by the OCA and cannot comment on the document. |
| 43. |
Q. |
With regard to the SLAL class hourly load data, can you please explain what this rate class comprised of and how is data for this rate class derived. Also, please explain the intra-day usage differences in the SLAL rate class. |
| |
A. |
SLAL rate class comprises Street Lighting (SL) and Area Lighting (AL) accounts. In January 2010, PPL Electric converted to using a new meter data management system (MDMS) to track the usage of customers. In regard to the SLAL rate class, there are no actual meters that are used to track the usage, the load data is derived using a sunrise/sunset profile based on number of lights that a customer has and the wattage of each of the lights. In addition, this class also includes a select number of traffic lights which account for the usage in the non-evening hours after 1/1/2010. |
| Block |
| |
|
No questions submitted for this category at this time. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Load Following Full Requirements |
| 1. |
Q. |
Are the historical load data provided on the RFP Web site de-rated for marginal losses? |
| |
A. |
No. Historical load data provided on the RFP Web site are not de-rated for marginal losses. However, hourly loss duration factors are provided on the RFP Web site so that each supplier may perform this calculation. |
| |
|
|
| 2. |
Q. |
Will suppliers be responsible for hourly loss de-rated load, and be paid for this level of load? |
|
A. |
Yes. For settlement purposes, suppliers will be responsible for the hourly loss de-rated load, and will be paid by PPL Electric for this hourly loss de-rated load. |
|
|
|
| 3. |
Q. |
To clarify the definition of energy supply equal to hourly loss de-rated load, is this the same load as defined by PJM reports of “Load without Losses?” |
|
A. |
The “Market Settlement Overview” on the PJM Web site indicates on page 99 that many billing items including spot market energy, congestion and reserve obligations are settled on what PJM calls “lossless load.” Other items such as capacity obligation and Network Transmission Service are settled on what PJM calls “Load + Losses.” PPL Electric reports to PJM hourly loads that include all applicable transmission and distribution losses. To access these hourly load data: click here. PJM derates these losses by marginal loss de-ration factors to derive settlement loads for spot market energy, congestion, reserve obligations and other items as indicated on page 99 of the referenced document. To access the marginal loss deration factors: click here. These loads, which include all losses and are de-rated for marginal losses, are the basis for PJM settlement and the basis for payment under the PPL Electric master agreements. It hence seems plausible that what PJM reports as “Load without Losses” is equivalent to load de-rated for marginal losses, but we have not been able to confirm that. We suggest that you contact PJM to confirm that what they report as “Load without Losses” is equivalent to the load de-rated for marginal losses. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Q. |
If supplier delivers 100 MW, is that supplier paid for 100 MW? |
|
A. |
PPL Electric Utilities will report to PJM loads that include all distribution and transmission losses (including PJM assigned 500 kV losses and unaccounted for energy). PJM will loss derate those loads for settlement purposes. For settlement purposes, suppliers will be responsible for the hourly loss de-rated load, and will be paid by PPL Electric for this hourly loss de-rated load. If the hourly loss derated load for your tranches is 100 MW in an hour you will be required to deliver 100 MW and will be paid for 100 MW. |
|
|
|
| 5. |
Q. |
In Full Requirements RFP Rules, the PLC (MW) for the Residential Customer Group are 3765 (01/01/11-05/31/11) and 3585 (06/01/11-12/31/11). Are these PLCs excluding 300 MW block supply contracts and up to an additional 50 MW of long-term unit entitlement supply contract or including both of them? For January-May, 2011, is the obligation 3765 or 3765-300 = 3465? |
|
A. |
The PLC (MW) for the Residential Customer Group as provided in the Full Requirements RFP Rules is for the entire Residential Customer Group.
Please note that these numbers are 'forecasts' or projections of PLCs, and will change to match actual peak load contributions once actual supply begins at the commencement of the supply period. For historical PLC data please see the Rate Category & Load Data from 2001 to present found here.
Please also see Data/General FAQ-4 and Data/General FAQ-15 for additional information. |
|
|
|
| 6. |
Q. |
The forecast PLCs of the Residential Group as provided in Full Requirements RFP Rules is significantly higher than the current and historical PLCs even considering load growth rate. How are the forecast PLCs in Full Requirements RFP Rules for the Residential Group estimated? |
|
A. |
Please refer to Data/General FAQ-4 and Data/General FAQ-15 for information related to your question. PPL Electric would like to emphasize that all of the PLCs provided in the Full Requirements RFP Rules are “forecast” values, based upon a litany of assumptions, and therefore will change to match actual peak load once supply begins. Also available are historic PLC values found in the “Rate Category and Load Data” workbook on PPL's DSPP Site, which show changes and variations in PPL Zone PLC from year to year, from 2004 to 2008. |
|
|
|
| 7. |
Q. |
The 2011 projected PLC as provided in the RFP Rules is 3585-3765 MW. Does this include long-term supply from NYPA, 300 MW block energy RFP, and up to 50 MW unit entitlement supply? In other words, to derive the load per tranche, before I apply the tranche size, do I need to deduct NYPA supply, the 300 MW from the Block Supply RFP, and unit entitlement supply from my total load forecast? |
|
A. |
The PLC (MW) for the Residential Customer Group as provided in the Full Requirements RFP Rules is for the entire Residential Customer Group including the portions to be served by long-term supply from NYPA, by the 300 MW block energy RFP, and by the 50 MW unit entitlement supply.
Please note that these numbers are 'forecasts' or projections of PLCs, and will change to match actual peak load contributions once actual supply begins at the commencement of the supply period. For historical PLC data please see the Rate Category & Load Data from 2001 to present: found here. For historical data related to the NYPA supply, please see the Historical NYPA Load Hourly Supply file: found here.
Please also see Data/General FAQ-4 and Data/General FAQ-15 for additional information. |
|
|
|
| AEC |
| |
|
No questions submitted for this category at this time. |
|
|
|
Return to top
|