|
Frequently Asked Questions - Rules
General, Block, Load Following Full Requirements, AEC
Return to Main FAQ Page
| General |
| 1. |
Q. |
When will bidders be notified if they have winning bids? |
|
A. |
Bidders will be notified by the close of business on the Bid Proposal Due Date if they have winning bids. |
|
|
|
| 2. |
Q. |
Will PPL Electric return partly executed SMAs to unsuccessful bidders? |
|
A. |
No, SMAs will not be returned to unsuccessful bidders in a solicitation. As stated in section 6.1.5 of the RFP Rules, if the RFP Bidder is not awarded quantities or tranches in the solicitation for which SMAs were provided, PPL Electric will retain the SMAs for any future solicitation in which the RFP Bidder may again submit a Bid Proposal. |
|
|
|
| 3. |
Q. |
Would the discussion between two Sellers regarding Assignment of one Seller's SMA load obligation to another violate any of the certifications or representation contained in the RFP Rules? |
|
A. |
Any discussion between two Sellers may violate terms of the RFP Rules, such as the Binding Bid Agreement. You should consult your attorney on this issue. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Q. |
Where can I find the detailed bid schedule for the PPL Electric Default Service Procurement Plan? |
| |
A. |
The detailed bid schedules for each RFP is posted on the RFP Schedule page of the Web site approximately six weeks prior to the Bid Proposal Due Date of each solicitation. An announcement will be sent to all Web site registrants regarding the posting at the beginning of each solicitation. |
|
|
|
| 5. |
Q. |
Our entire team is going to be out of the country the week that bids are due. Is there any way to submit a sealed bid by the end of the week prior to the Bid Proposal Due Date? |
|
A. |
All Bid Proposal Spreadsheet(s) must be submitted by secure electronic file transfer to the PPL secure server during the window to submit bids on the Bid Proposal Due Date. Please note that the electronic file transfer system is web-based and can be accessed from any location as long as you have an internet connection. |
|
|
|
| Block |
| 1. |
Q. |
If you wish to make a price offer for 4 Total Tranches Supplied, must you enter price offers for all smaller numbers of tranches (1, 2 and 3) that are lower price offers than that for 4 Total Tranches? |
|
A. |
If you wish to enter a price offer for 4 Total Tranches Supplied, you must also enter bids for 1, 2, and 3 Total Tranches Supplied.
However, there are no restrictions on the dollar amounts of the prices that you enter into the cells of the Bid Proposal Spreadsheet. If you bid on 4 Total Tranches Supplied, your bids for one, two or three tranches could be more or less than your bid for 4 tranches. Please keep in mind that there are strict rules governing the cells that must be filled out in order for your Bid Proposal Spreadsheet to be accepted. |
| |
|
|
| Load Following Full Requirements |
| 1. |
Q. |
For each category of AECs (i.e., Tier I (non-Solar), Tier I (Solar) and Tier II), is there a requirement to name only one price for all quantities of the same category of AECs bid? |
|
A. |
Yes. For each solicitation and each product, the bidder must name the quantity of AECs the bidder is willing to supply and must name only one price for all such AECs. |
| |
|
|
| 2. |
Q. |
If you wish to make a price offer for 4 Total Tranches Supplied, must you enter price offers for all smaller numbers of tranches (1, 2 and 3) that are lower price offers than that for 4 Total Tranches? |
|
A. |
If you wish to enter a price offer for 4 Total Tranches Supplied, you must also enter bids for 1, 2, and 3 Total Tranches Supplied.
However, there are no restrictions on the dollar amounts of the prices that you enter into the cells of the Bid Proposal Spreadsheet. If you bid on 4 Total Tranches Supplied, your bids for one, two or three tranches could be more or less than your bid for 4 tranches. Please keep in mind that there are strict rules governing the cells that must be filled out in order for your Bid Proposal Spreadsheet to be accepted. |
| 3. |
Q. |
Regarding the Full Requirements RFP, can you provide me details regarding the specific products offered in each solicitation as well as the percent of the Full Requirements Load that will served by each product? Is there any graphics regarding the products offered in each solicitation available on the RFP Web site? |
|
A. |
For the specific products offered in each solicitation as well as the percent of load that will be served by each product, please refer to sections 1.1.13 and 1.1.16 of the Full Requirements RFP Rules, respectively. For a graphical layout that shows which products are being offered at each solicitation, please see page 21 and 22 of the “DSPP Plan Overview” Presentation available on the RFP Web site: click here. |
| 4. |
Q. |
In the Full Requirements RFP, there are a total of 8 tranches between the two products for the Residential Group, and a solicitation load cap of 6 tranches applied to these two products in the Residential Group. Can a bidder bid on all 8 tranches knowing that it can only be awarded 6 of them or do we have to limit our bids to a total of 6 tranches between the two Residential products? Would the solicitation load cap be applied in the same manner in the Small C&I Group where there are a total of 6 tranches for the two Small C&I products and a solicitation load cap of 5 tranches in the Small C&I group? |
|
A. |
For the Full Requirements RFP, a bidder cannot bid (as opposed to ‘win’) more than 6 tranches across both the 17-month and 20-month products in the Residential Group and a bidder cannot bid more than 5 tranches across both the 17-month and 20-month products in the Small C&I Group. If a bidder bids on a number of tranches that exceeds the solicitation load cap for a Customer Group, the RFP Manager will strike sufficient Bids from a Bid Proposal Spreadsheet to ensure that the Bids are consistent with the solicitation load cap. The RFP Manager will strike a Bid first from the product for which there is the most competition, as measured by the ratio of the tranches bid to the number of tranches needed. |
|
|
|
| AEC |
| 1. |
Q. |
What is the amount and type of AECs that PPL Electric seeks to procure through the AEC RFP? What vintage of AECs are eligible? |
|
A. |
Through the Alternate Energy Credits (“AEC”) RFP, PPL Electric purchases AECs necessary to meet the AEPS Obligation associated with its purchases of Block Energy Supply under its Default Service Procurement Plan (“DSPP”). In the AEC RFP, AECs will be procured through multiple solicitations that mirror the purchases of Block Energy Supply under the DSPP. In each solicitation, the vintage of the AECs must enable PPL Electric to comply with the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards for retail sales of energy during the supply period covered by the Block Energy Supply. In each solicitation, PPL Electric seeks to procure the following categories of AECs: Tier 1, Tier 2, and Photo-voltaic (a subset of the Tier 1 AECs). Before each solicitation, PPL Electric will announce the amount that it seeks to purchase in each category.
For example, in the first solicitation, PPL electric purchased 50 MW of Block Supply for a delivery period beginning January 1, 2011 through May 31, 2011. Correspondingly, PPL Electric sought to purchase 4,965 Tier I (Non-Solar) AECs, 34 Tier I (Solar) AECs, and 10,331 Tier II AECs. The AEPS Act permits EDCs and EGSs to bank AECs created in one reporting year for use in either or both of the two subsequent reporting periods. See 73 P.S. § 1648.3(e)(6). As such, any AECs procured pursuant to the AEC RFP in the first solicitation must be based on renewable energy generated between June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
| 2. |
Q. |
Can you confirm that the delivery period and target quantities for solicitations 5 and 6 of the AEC RFP are the same? |
|
A. |
This is correct. In each of the solicitation 5 and solicitation 6, PPL Electric will seek to procure a total of 84,613 Tier I (non-solar AECs), 1,880 Tier I (Solar AECs), and 129,645 Tier II AECs for a delivery period of 5 years beginning in January 1, 2011. The AECs will be delivered throughout the 5 year period to meet the prescribed requirements within the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act (“AEPS Act”) at 73 P.S. §§ 1648.1-1648.8. The quantities of AECs required to comply with AEPS requirements for a compliance year gradually increases during the 5 year delivery period.
Through the Alternative Energy Credits (“AEC”) RFP, PPL Electric purchases AECs necessary to meet the AEPS Obligation associated with its purchases of Block Energy Supply under its Default Service Procurement Plan (“DSPP”). In the AEC RFP, AECs will be procured through multiple solicitations that mirror the purchases of Block Energy Supply under the DSPP. In the fifth solicitation and the sixth solicitation, PPL Electric is soliciting bids to block energy supply for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. As such, PPL Electric will also solicit bids to supply Tier I (solar), Tier I (non-solar) and Tier II AECs that comply with the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards for retail sales of energy during the supply period covered by the Block Energy Supply of January 1 through December 31, 2015. |
|
|
|
| 3. |
Q. |
In RFP, PLC(MW) for residential class are 3765 (01/01/11~05/31/11) and 3585 (06/01/11~12/31/11). Are these excluding 300 MW block supply contracts and up to an additional 50 MW a long-term unit entitlement supply contract or including both of them? For Jan ~ May/11, is the obligation 3765 or 3765-300 = 3465? |
|
A. |
The PLC (MW) for the Residential Customer Group as provided in the Full Requirements RFP Rules is for the entire Residential Customer Group.
Please note that these numbers are 'forecasts' or projections of PLCs, and will change to match actual peak load contributions once actual supply begins at the commencement of the supply period. For historical PLC data please see the Rate Category & Load Data from 2001 to present found here.
Please also see Data/General FAQ-4 and FAQ-10 for additional information. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Q. |
For each solicitation, please specify the compliance year applicable to the target quantities. Also, from which period of generation can the RECs come from for each solicitation? |
|
A. |
Through the Alternative Energy Credits (“AEC”) RFP, PPL Electric purchases AECs necessary to meet the AEPS Obligation associated with its purchases of Block Energy Supply under its Default Service Procurement Plan (“DSPP”). In the AEC RFP, AECs will be procured through multiple solicitations that mirror the purchases of Block Energy Supply under the DSPP.
For example, in the second solicitation, PPL Electric solicited bids to supply Tier I (solar), Tier I (non-solar) and Tier II AECs for the period January 1 through August 31, 2011. These AECs must comply with the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards for retail sales of energy during the supply period covered by the Block Energy Supply of January 1 through August 31, 2011. In particular, 5/8 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category will be used for the compliance period June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011, and 3/8 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category will be used for the compliance period June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2012.
The AEPS Act permits EDCs and EGSs to bank AECs created in one reporting year for use in either or both of the two subsequent reporting periods. See 73 P.S. § 1648.3(e)(6). As such, in the October 2009 solicitation, 5/8 of the AECs procured must be based on renewable energy generated between June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2011 and the remaining 3/8 of the AECs procured must be based on renewable energy generated between June 1, 2009 through May 31, 2012.
(Note: this response is not applicable to the July 2010 solicitation and all future solicitations. Please refer to the document “AEC Revised Delivery Schedule” posted to the supplier documents page for related information.) |
| 5. |
Q. |
My understanding is that the second solicitation of the AEC RFP is for eight months only. How will subsequent auctions work? Also, can you recommend what is a reasonable price to assume? |
|
|
|
|
A. |
The first solicitation and second solicitation of the AEC RFP is for 5-month and 8-month contracts, respectively. Please see Rules/AEC FAQ-1 and Rules/AEC FAQ-4 for more information as to the duration of contracts in subsequent solicitations. We are unable to recommend what price to "assume" for AECs as this is a component of the RFP process and is subject to the results of the bid. |
| |
|
|
| 6. |
Q. |
Are there any supplier caps on the AEPS bids, either within a single solicitation or among all the solicitations? For example, can one supplier provide all of the AEPS requirements for PPL? Is there a minimum number of required bids within a solicitation for each product in order for the solicitation to be considered competitive? Is there a maximum allowable price for any of the products above which bids will be automatically rejected? |
|
A. |
There are no supplier caps established for the AEC RFP and one supplier may provide all of the AECs for a given product or in a given solicitation. There is no maximum allowable price for any of the products. The Commission makes the decision whether or not to accept the results of the RFP. |
|
|
|
| 7. |
Q. |
Can you provide information surrounding the eligible vintage of Alternative Energy Credits (“AECs”) supplied pursuant to the AEC RFP for this April 2010 solicitation? |
|
A. |
The AEPS Act permits EDCs and EGSs to bank AECs created in one reporting year for use in either or both of the two subsequent reporting periods. See 73 P.S. § 1648.3(e)(6). As such, in this April 2010 solicitation, 5/14 of the AECs procured must be based on renewable energy generated between June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2011 and the remaining 9/14of the AECs procured must be based on renewable energy generated between June 1, 2009 through May 31, 2012. Suppliers must provide AECs in these proportions as well.
(Note: this response is not applicable to the July 2010 solicitation and all future solicitations. Please refer to the document “AEC Revised Delivery Schedule” posted to the supplier documents page for related information.) |
|
|
|
| 8. |
Q. |
The RFP team responded to a question regarding the generation period for AECs offered in the October 2009 solicitation that 5/8 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category would be used for the compliance period June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011, and 3/8 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category would be used for the compliance period June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011. Can the same calculation be assumed for the 11-month portion of the January 2010 solicitation? In other words, will 5/11 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category be used for the compliance period June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011, and 6/11 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category be used for the compliance period June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2012? |
|
A. |
Yes, the same calculation as described in Rules/AEC FAQ-4 can be assumed for the 11-month AEC products. Through the Alternative Energy Credits (“AEC”) RFP, PPL Electric purchases AECs necessary to meet the AEPS Obligation associated with its purchases of Block Energy Supply under its Default Service Procurement Plan (“DSPP”). In the AEC RFP, AECs will be procured through multiple solicitations that mirror the purchases of Block Energy Supply under the DSPP.
For example, in the January 2010 solicitation, PPL Electric solicited bids to supply Tier I (solar), Tier I (non-solar) and Tier II AECs for the period January 1 through November 30, 2011. These AECs must comply with the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards for retail sales of energy during the supply period covered by the Block Energy Supply of January 1 through November 30, 2011. In particular, 5/11 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category will be used for the compliance period June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011, and 6/11 of the target AEC quantities of each AEC category will be used for the compliance period June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2012.
(Note: this response is not applicable to the July 2010 solicitation and all future solicitations. Please refer to the document “AEC Revised Delivery Schedule” posted to the supplier documents page for related information.) |
|
|
|
| 9. |
Q. |
The AEC procurement target quantities for the 11-month term, starting January 2011, doesn’t match the renewable obligation associated with a 50 MW block. What is the reason behind the difference? |
|
A. |
The AEC procurement target quantities provided in the RFP Rules are correct and match the renewable obligation associated with a 50 MW block.
Please note that the AEPS Act requires that the Tier I and Tier II compliance requirements be based on electric energy sold to retail electric customers, not the total generation used by an EDC or EGS to meet customer demand. (see AEPS Act at 73 P.S. § 1648.3(b)).
As such, in order to calculate the AEC quantities, you will first need to apply an 8.04% loss factor to energy quantities, which is the loss factor to the retail meter. AEPS requirements are then applied to the energy quantities.
For example, for the AEPS Tier II requirements, the requirement is 6.2 percent of the total retail sales of electricity to all retail electric customers for the period. 50 MW of block supply corresponds to approximately 400,800 MWh for the period January 1, 2011 through November 30, 2011. The total retail sales of electricity to all retail electric customers for the 11-month period based on a 50 MW block supply is estimated to be approximately 368,576 MHW (400,800 MWh x (100%-8.04%)). The total AEC quantities is 22,850 (ie., 6.2% x 368,576 MWh). |
|
|
|
| 10. |
Q. |
What is the delivery schedule associated with AEC bids for the 11-month term starting January 2011? Would the bidder be required to deliver an equal quantity of AECs every month, or would it be a pro rata share based on MWhs? |
|
A. |
Under the terms of the AEC SMA, there is a specific amount that has to be delivered each month of the delivery period (the “Monthly Settlement Quantity”). The Monthly Settlement Quantity must be transferred to PPL Electric’s GATS account within 40 calendar days of each month of the delivery period, and within 50 calendar days of the last month of the delivery period.
The seller is required to transfer AECs to PPL Electric’s PJM-EIS GATS account during the delivery period in generally equal amounts each month. As stated in Article 1 of the AEC SMA, ‘Monthly Settlement Quantity’ means, with respect to any calendar month during the Delivery Period except the last month, the product of (i) the hours in that month divided by the total number of hours in the Delivery Period; and (ii) the Specified Amount. For the last month in the Delivery Period, the Monthly Settlement Quantity means the Specified Amount less the sum of all Monthly Settlement Quantities for the previous months in the Delivery Period.
Please consult section 2.3(c) and 2.3(d) of the AEC SMA for more information.
(Note: this response is not applicable to the July 2010 solicitation and all future solicitations. Please refer to the document “AEC Revised Delivery Schedule” posted to the supplier documents page for related information.) |
|
|
|
| 11. |
Q. |
How can my company put in alternative bids? The spreadsheet cannot be altered. We want to offer different quantities at different prices, like a supply curve. |
|
A. |
Please note that for each AEC Product, an RFP Bidder may only name a maximum quantity supplied and a single price for all the quantity of AECs indicated by the RFP Bidder. There are no alternative forms of bids. Please also note that in the AEC RFP, in each solicitation, an RFP bidder may only submit one Bid Proposal Spreadsheet for each AEC Product Category: a maximum of one Bid Proposal Spreadsheet for Tier I Products, one Bid Proposal Spreadsheet for Tier I (Photo-Voltaic) Products and one Bid Proposal Spreadsheet for Tier II Products. |
|
|
|
| 12. |
Q. |
Can you clarify how bids will be removed in the event that bid assurance collateral is insufficient for the AEC RFP? |
|
A. |
The bid assurance collateral requirement is $25,000 per AEC product in the AEC RFP. The RFP Manager will determine for each RFP Bidder the greatest number of AEC products its amount of bid assurance collateral is sufficient to support. If bid assurance collateral is insufficient to support the number of AEC products the bidder provided a bid on then the RFP Manager will remove a bid first from the product where there is the most competition, as measured by the ratio of the total quantity bid to the total quantity needed. |
|
|
|
| 13. |
Q. |
Are bids in the AEC RFP "all or nothing?" For example, if we bid a maximum quantity of 1,500 AECs, could we potentially receive an award for only 500 AECs? |
|
A. |
For the AEC RFP, the bids are not “all or nothing.” As part of your bid, you will be required to name a maximum quantity of AECs you are willing to supply for the AEC product you are bidding on. As such it is possible that if you indicate a maximum quantity of 1,500 AECs, you may be awarded only 500 AECs. |
|
|
|
| 14. |
Q. |
I understand that the qualification requirement that an AEC supplier or parent/guarantor be rated by a major credit agency is now optional due to a PUC submission. In offering our AECs in the RFP process, we would like to be able to offer different prices for each of the different delivery years, but at present, only one offer price is allowed for the entire 5-year period. Can we go through a similar process as the one that was undertaken to remove the credit rating requirement to amend the bidding format? |
|
A. |
On March 11, 2009, PPL Electric filed its process to establish the Alternative Energy Credits (“AEC”) RFP under a Joint Petition for Settlement and submitted its petition along with statements in support by parties in the proceeding. On June 30, 2009, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“Commission”) approved the Joint Petition for Settlement. Any modification to this process approved by the Commission would require a petition to the Commission, would be subject to comment by all the parties to the Settlement, and would require approval by the Commission.
On November 16, 2009, PPL Electric filed a petition to eliminate the requirement that an applicant demonstrate that its, or its guarantor’s, debt rating be available from S&P, Fitch, or Moody’s for the AEC RFP. On December 17, 2009 the Commission approved PPL Electric‘s petition. PPL Electric does not intend to file a petition to amend the bidding format in the AEC RFP. |
| 15. |
Q. |
For the July 2010 solicitation, is the Target Quantity for Tier 1 Solar 1,880 AECs per year for 5 years for a total of 9,400 AECs? Or is it a total of 1,880 for the full 5 year period? |
|
A. |
In the July 2010 solicitation, the target quantity of 1,880 AECs for the Photo-Voltaic product is for the entire 5-year supply period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. Please also refer to the document “AEC Revised Delivery Schedule” for information regarding the AEC delivery schedule that is required for winning AEC Suppliers in the July 2010 Solicitation. |
|
|
|
Return to top
|